AI Visibility
measured66/100
Frequently Cited · in Expense Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
97
across 180 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 164 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Expense Management
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Emburse is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 review volume (e.g., 2,018 reviews for Emburse Expense Enterprise) and first-party evaluation content like “Emburse vs. Concur.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Organization sameAs) and ensure it’s consistently present across product and pricing pages so AI Overviews can reliably extract “what it is / pricing / integrations” in one pass.
Based on audit of emburse.com · May 19, 2026