AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 174 prompts
AI Share of Voice
15%
across 174 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Electives is visible in
1Executive summary
Electives.io has strong AI-citation potential for evaluation-stage queries because it is present on G2 with a 5.0 rating and 18 reviews, and it publishes publicly crawlable pricing ranges (e.g., $20,000–$50,000 starting for “Growing”). The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation for “Electives pricing” and evaluation-stage “vs/alternatives” queries if AI engines can’t reliably extract structured product/pricing entities (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and if first-party comparison pages are missing or not consistently indexed.
Based on audit of electives.io · Oct 9, 2026