AI Visibility
measured66/100
Frequently Cited · in AI Recruiting
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals14/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
31
across 448 prompts
AI Share of Voice
31%
across 448 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Recruiting
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Eightfold.ai is a B2B HR/talent intelligence SaaS with strong third-party review presence (e.g., 205 G2 reviews) and Gartner Peer Insights coverage, so it’s likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage queries like “Eightfold pricing” and evaluation comparisons where AI needs crawlable first-party pricing/comparison content; the highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, tiered pricing (SSR) and add first-party “[Eightfold] vs [Competitor]” pages that clearly recommend Eightfold.
Based on audit of eightfold.ai · May 21, 2026