AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 167 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 167 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories eFront is visible in
1Executive summary
eFront is a B2B enterprise LMS with meaningful third-party review presence (e.g., G2 shows 25 reviews at 4.5/5). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage queries that require first-party, crawlable comparison/evaluation content—especially “[eFront] vs [competitor]” and “pricing” citations—because first-party structured evaluation signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) were not found and pricing is partially quote-driven.
Based on audit of efrontlearning.com · Sep 1, 2026