AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in LLM Hosting
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 290 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 290 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Education Lms Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in LLM Hosting
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Edureka is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Edureka surfaces in 0/80 Education Lms discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Edureka has strong third-party credibility signals for AI citation (notably G2 shows 343 reviews at 4.6/5), but it is likely under-cited for Education LMS evaluation queries because its first-party “LMS for X” positioning and software-evaluation structured data are not clearly aligned to buyer intents like competency-based learning and nonprofit/higher-ed use cases. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, first-party evaluation pages that explicitly answer the gap queries (e.g., “best LMS for competency-based education programs”) and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data so AI engines can extract them.
Based on audit of edureka.co · Sep 30, 2026