AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals44/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 289 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 289 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
eduMe is a B2B frontline enablement/LMS-style software with solid third-party review presence (e.g., 35 reviews on G2 at 4.7/5). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: eduMe appears to rely on third-party and blog-style “alternatives” content rather than having crawlable first-party comparison/pricing surfaces that AI engines can confidently cite for shortlist and “vs/alternatives” queries.
Based on audit of edume.com · Sep 3, 2026