[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Drata
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

32

across 1648 prompts

AI Share of Voice

32%

across 1648 prompts

Category Visibility

#22

in Cloud Security · of 182

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Brand Accuracy

4/437

citations with inaccuracies

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
1096 category
Cited39%427/1096
Share of voice31%avg
Engine consensus58%of engines
Competitors16.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited100%11/11
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentimentpositive15+ / 15~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentimentpositive5+ / 7~ / 0−
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentimentneutral1+ / 11~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Drata is visible in

5
  • Compliance Automation2 of 198→
  • GRC Platforms2 of 116→
  • Risk, Compliance & GRC3 of 229→
  • Cloud Security22 of 182→
  • Security25 of 275→

Executive summary

Drata is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 review volume (1,325+ reviews) and active first-party comparison content (e.g., Drata vs Secureframe, Drata vs Vanta). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve conversion-stage citation by making pricing more AI-crawlable (public, tiered, and SSR) since the current plans page shows “Get Personalized Pricing” and “Contact Sales” rather than clear public prices.

Based on audit of drata.com · Jun 21, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy