AI Visibility
measured48/100
Frequently Cited · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
24
across 47 prompts
AI Share of Voice
0%
across 29 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Drag is a strong B2B SaaS citation candidate because it has a high-review G2 presence (261 reviews, 4.5★) and publicly crawlable, tiered pricing. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while Drag has first-party “How we compare” and competitor-specific pages, you should ensure each audited competitor query (Front, Hiver, Gmelius, Help Scout, Missive) has a dedicated, indexable first-party page that clearly positions Drag as the recommended solution and includes self-contained answer blocks.
Based on audit of dragapp.com · Apr 2, 2026