[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/doppio.sh
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

69

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

7

across 95 prompts

AI Share of Voice

1%

across 87 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
87 category
Cited1%1/87
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
2 brand-level
Cited100%2/2
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors4.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
1 brand-level
Cited100%1/1
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories doppio.sh is visible in

1
  • Proposal & CPQnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Pylon is already highly citable for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong G2 presence (77 reviews, 4.7★) and publicly accessible pricing with explicit tiers (e.g., $59/$89/$139 per seat/mo). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/unclear structured data for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and potential crawlability gaps for AI-specific discovery signals (llms.txt/robots.txt verification), which can reduce eligibility for “best customer support software” and “alternatives” shortlists.

Based on audit of usepylon.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy