AI Visibility
measured15/100
Emerging · in Proposal & CPQ
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals69/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 96 prompts
AI Share of Voice
2%
across 88 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Proposal & CPQ
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories doppio.sh is visible in
1Executive summary
Pylon is already highly citable for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong G2 presence (77 reviews, 4.7★) and publicly accessible pricing with explicit tiers (e.g., $59/$89/$139 per seat/mo). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/unclear structured data for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and potential crawlability gaps for AI-specific discovery signals (llms.txt/robots.txt verification), which can reduce eligibility for “best customer support software” and “alternatives” shortlists.
Based on audit of usepylon.com · May 7, 2026