[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/DoorLoop
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

27

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

37

across 160 prompts

AI Share of Voice

37%

across 160 prompts

Category Visibility

#7

in Real Estate & Property Management · of 70

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
82 category
Cited35%29/82
Share of voice23%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors24.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories DoorLoop is visible in

1
  • Real Estate & Property Management7 of 70→

Executive summary

DoorLoop is already well-positioned to be cited for evaluation and conversion queries because it has a strong G2 presence (247 reviews) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers and per-unit pricing. The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage structured extraction: while pricing is crawlable, there’s no clear evidence (from live checks) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating structured data on key pages, which can reduce eligibility for Google AI Overviews and other LLM rich-answer formatting.

Based on audit of doorloop.com · Jun 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy