AI Visibility
measured72/100
Frequently Cited · in Community Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals7/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
25
across 764 prompts
AI Share of Voice
25%
across 764 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
45/80
Challenger · Community Management Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Community Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Discourse is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Discourse surfaces in 45/80 Community Management discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 35 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Discourse is already well-positioned for AI citation in discovery queries like “top community management platforms for small businesses” and “top community management tools for remote teams,” and it has strong first-party crawlable pricing plus multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., /compare/circle, /compare/khoros). The highest-risk gap for evaluation-stage recommendations is missing/insufficient structured “SoftwareApplication” + evaluation FAQ coverage for specific buyer segments (e.g., 100-person HR department, 10-person sales team, local shops), which prevents AI engines from confidently matching Discourse to those niche prompts.
Based on audit of discourse.org · May 7, 2026