AI Visibility
measured63/100
Frequently Cited · in Headless CMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 748 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 730 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Headless CMS
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Directus is very likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (notably G2 and Capterra) and a crawlable, tiered pricing page. The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/unclear structured-data + first-party evaluation assets (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage and brand-led comparison pages), which reduces eligibility for “Directus vs X” and “Directus pricing” direct-answer citations.
Based on audit of directus.io · Apr 2, 2026