[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

16

across 221 prompts

AI Share of Voice

13%

across 200 prompts

Category Visibility

#26

in Identity & Access Management · of 81

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
195 category
Cited17%34/195
Share of voice11%avg
Engine consensus38%of engines
Competitors11.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited79%11/14
Share of voice79%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited40%2/5
Share of voice40%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice72%avg
Engine consensus67%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is visible in

2
  • Identity & Access Management26 of 81→
  • Secrets Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

CyberArk is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 220 G2 reviews with a 4.5/5 rating) and first-party comparison pages like “CyberArk vs Teleport” that give AI a direct evaluation surface. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Structured Data + Technical AEO for evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensure pricing/crawlability is AI-readable, so AI can cite CyberArk for “pricing” and “vs” prompts without relying on third parties.

Based on audit of cyberark.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy