AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in AI Recruiting
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 238 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 238 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Recruiting
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Crosschq is visible in
2Executive summary
Crosschq is strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via its G2 presence (164 reviews, 4.6★) and G2 comparison surfaces (e.g., Crosschq vs Xref, Crosschq vs HiPeople). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage self-citation: the site appears to lack a publicly crawlable pricing page and may lack first-party, brand-led comparison pages for the exact competitor set (Xref, HiPeople, VICTIG Background Checks, Hireology, Checkr). Highest-ROI fix: publish/SSR a crawlable pricing page and add first-party, brand-led comparison pages that directly answer the exact prompts (especially the “How does Crosschq compare to …?” set).
Based on audit of crosschq.com · Oct 9, 2026