AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Agent Frameworks
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 70 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 64 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Agent Frameworks
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Crossbeam is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large G2 presence (414 reviews) and publicly crawlable, tiered pricing. The biggest risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “how to compare / what to choose” queries: there’s no clear evidence (from live search) of first-party “[Crossbeam] vs [Competitor]” comparison pages, which AI engines often rely on for shortlist recommendations.
Based on audit of crossbeam.com · Sep 30, 2026