AI Visibility
measured10/100
Emerging · in Team Messaging
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals10/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
59
across 363 prompts
AI Share of Voice
59%
across 363 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
1/80
Not Visible · Team Messaging Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Team Messaging
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Crew is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Crew surfaces in 1/80 Team Messaging discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 79 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Crewapp.com is already cited for at least one team-messaging coordination query (ChatGPT cites it for event-planner coordination), and it has strong third-party credibility via Gartner Peer Insights and active customer proof pages. The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage “best team messaging apps for enterprise/remote/large enterprises” queries: Crew lacks first-party comparison/evaluation surfaces (no visible “Crew vs …” pages found) and likely lacks SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data, which prevents AI engines from confidently recommending it across the highest-value gap prompts.
Based on audit of crewapp.com · May 7, 2026