AI Visibility
measured36/100
Emerging · in Legal Tech
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals7/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
24
across 162 prompts
AI Share of Voice
24%
across 162 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Legal Tech
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
CosmoLex is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation and conversion prompts because it has a large G2 review base (331 reviews, 4.2★) and first-party comparison surfaces (e.g., CosmoLex vs 8am MyCase and vs Clio). The biggest risk for AI engines is conversion-stage pricing citation reliability: while a public pricing page exists and shows per-user tiers, some third-party sources report that parts of pricing may be quote/contact-gated, so AI may not consistently extract complete pricing for “How much does CosmoLex cost?” and “Is CosmoLex worth it for a law firm with multiple users?”.
Based on audit of cosmolex.com · Oct 7, 2026