AI Visibility
measured9/100
Invisible · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals11/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
14
across 170 prompts
AI Share of Voice
14%
across 170 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Continu is a B2B enterprise learning/LMS platform and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (719 reviews) and Gartner Peer Insights (4.6 rating from 123 ratings). The biggest risk to appear in evaluation-stage AI answers is missing/unclear structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and potentially weak crawlability signals for AI bots on key pages (pricing + comparison + case studies); the single highest-ROI fix is to ensure pricing and evaluation pages are fully SSR-crawlable and backed by SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema so AI engines can quote them reliably.
Based on audit of continu.com · May 7, 2026