AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
88
across 65 prompts
AI Share of Voice
88%
across 65 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
scirra.com (redirecting to construct.net) is strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via its G2 presence (25 reviews, 4.1★) and has crawlable, tiered pricing pages with explicit plan/seat thresholds. The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/insufficient first-party comparison coverage for the exact evaluation prompts (especially “How does Construct 3 compare to Unity?” and “How does Construct 3 compare to GameMaker?”) and lack of clearly detectable B2B-structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) on the site.
Based on audit of scirra.com · Oct 4, 2026