AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in AI Applications
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 293 prompts
AI Share of Voice
0%
across 276 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Applications
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Conduit.ai is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a live G2 presence (20 reviews shown on its G2 seller page) and publicly crawlable, tiered pricing ($18–$48 per unit/mo plus a $899/mo Startup plan). The biggest AI citation risk is conversion-stage “pricing/plan” and evaluation-stage “SoftwareApplication/structured extraction” reliability—your site has pricing and FAQs, but key machine-readable schema (SoftwareApplication/AggregateRating) could not be verified via search, and llms.txt/robots/sitemap were not accessible to confirm.
Based on audit of conduit.ai · Oct 9, 2026