AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Contract Lifecycle Management
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 308 prompts
AI Share of Voice
1%
across 288 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Contract Lifecycle Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Concord is visible in
2Executive summary
Concord is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (133 reviews, 4.2★) and first-party comparison content like “Concord vs. DocuSign CLM” plus a publicly accessible pricing page with tiered prices. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen structured-data coverage for B2B evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for the exact comparison/pricing prompts) and ensure AI-crawlability of the most important pages (robots/SSR verification), so models can cite Concord directly for “best” and “worth it” prompts.
Based on audit of concord.app · Apr 1, 2026