[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Concord
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

10

across 316 prompts

AI Share of Voice

8%

across 296 prompts

Category Visibility

#19

in Contract Lifecycle Management · of 60

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
174 category
Cited22%39/174
Share of voice11%avg
Engine consensus39%of engines
Competitors7.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited79%11/14
Share of voice71%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors1.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited43%3/7
Share of voice24%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice78%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Concord is visible in

2
  • Contract Lifecycle Management19 of 60→
  • Proposal & CPQnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Concord is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (133 reviews, 4.2★) and first-party comparison content like “Concord vs. DocuSign CLM” plus a publicly accessible pricing page with tiered prices. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen structured-data coverage for B2B evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for the exact comparison/pricing prompts) and ensure AI-crawlability of the most important pages (robots/SSR verification), so models can cite Concord directly for “best” and “worth it” prompts.

Based on audit of concord.app · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy