AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Billing & Invoicing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
18
across 204 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 194 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/74
Not Visible · Hr Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Billing & Invoicing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Arc surfaces in 0/74 Hr discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 74 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Arc.dev has strong AI-citation foundations for evaluation and conversion queries because it has a publicly crawlable pricing page and first-party comparison content (e.g., Toptal vs Arc) plus a strong G2 presence (18 reviews, 4.8★). The biggest risk is discovery-stage invisibility for HR-specific buyer intents (e.g., “HR software for retail management” and “HR software for remote teams in tech”), which likely prevents Arc from being shortlisted in “best HR tools” style prompts.
Based on audit of arc.dev · Oct 9, 2026