AI Visibility
measured29/100
Emerging · in UI/UX Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals35/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
36
across 232 prompts
AI Share of Voice
36%
across 232 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in UI/UX Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
getcockpit.io is likely cited by AI engines mainly through G2 for evaluation-stage queries (e.g., “Cockpit reviews” / “best sales enablement software”), but it is missing key first-party evaluation assets (notably crawlable pricing and comparison surfaces) that enable conversion-stage citation. Highest-ROI fix: publish/ensure SSR-crawlable first-party pages for pricing and evaluation (e.g., “Cockpit vs X” and “Cockpit pricing”) so AI answers can cite getcockpit.io directly instead of relying on third-party review pages.
Based on audit of getcockpit.io · Sep 29, 2026