AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in HRIS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 333 prompts
AI Share of Voice
15%
across 333 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in HRIS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories ChartHop is visible in
2Executive summary
ChartHop is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (164 reviews, 4.3★) and first-party comparison pages like “ChartHop vs HiBob” and “ChartHop vs BambooHR.” The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B evaluation structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + pricing/Product+Offer) so AI engines can reliably extract answers for “How much does ChartHop cost?” and “Is ChartHop worth it for a mid-market HR and Finance team?”
Based on audit of charthop.com · Oct 7, 2026