AI Visibility
measured28/100
Emerging · in AI Recruiting
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 246 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 246 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Recruiting
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories candidate.fyi is visible in
2Executive summary
candidate.fyi is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has an active G2 presence (25–26 reviews) and a publicly crawlable pricing page. The biggest risk for AI “shortlist” and “alternatives” queries is missing/weak first-party evaluation surfaces (especially structured comparison + SoftwareApplication/FAQ targeting) that AI engines can cite directly from candidate.fyi rather than only from G2/Capterra.
Based on audit of candidate.fyi · Sep 1, 2026