AI Visibility
measured38/100
Emerging · in Hospitality & Restaurants
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals13/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
29
across 191 prompts
AI Share of Voice
29%
across 191 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Hospitality & Restaurants
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
canarytechnologies.com is a B2B hospitality software vendor with strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (4.8/5 from 24 reviews) and multiple outcome-dense customer case studies. The biggest AI-visibility risk is evaluation-stage crawlability/structured-data gaps (no evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating in live search) plus weak/unclear pricing transparency (pricing appears to be “Get custom pricing”). Highest-ROI fix: publish crawlable, tiered pricing (or at least public plan/price ranges) and add SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema on evaluation pages so AI engines can confidently cite pricing and product fit.
Based on audit of canarytechnologies.com · May 7, 2026