AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Field Service & Workforce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 272 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 272 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Field Service & Workforce
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
busybusy.com is a B2B construction time tracking/job costing SaaS with strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (158 reviews) and public, tiered pricing ($0/Pro/Premium) that AI crawlers can read. The biggest risk to appearing in evaluation-stage answers is missing/unclear first-party structured comparison + structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/ratings) that AI engines use for “{Brand} vs {Competitor}” and “{Brand} pricing” queries.
Based on audit of busybusy.com · Oct 4, 2026