AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Finance
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 156 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 156 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Accounting Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Finance
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Burkland is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Burkland surfaces in 0/80 Accounting discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Burkland is already strongly citable for branded evaluation and comparison-style prompts because it has a high-rated G2 profile (18 reviews, 4.9★) and first-party comparison content like “Burkland vs. Pilot.” The biggest AI-visibility risk is discovery-stage accounting prompts (e.g., “top accounting tools for startups” and “best accounting software for freelancers”) where the brand appears to have 0/80 visibility, so it needs category-level, use-case-specific pages that match those exact query intents.
Based on audit of burklandassociates.com · Aug 30, 2026