AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Real Estate & Property Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
40
across 486 prompts
AI Share of Voice
40%
across 486 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Real Estate & Property Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Buildout is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a first-party pricing page with public seat pricing (e.g., $125/user/month) and it appears on major B2B review platforms (G2 and Capterra). The biggest risk for AI citation is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” coverage: the site has comparison-style content, but there’s no clear evidence (from live search) of first-party, crawlable “[Buildout] vs [Competitor]” pages that AI can reliably cite.
Based on audit of buildout.com · Sep 29, 2026