AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Commerce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 162 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 162 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Scheduling Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Commerce
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Booxi is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Booxi surfaces in 0/80 Scheduling discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Booxi has strong baseline B2B citation signals via G2 (18 reviews, 4.5★) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers for retail multi-location brands. The biggest AI-visibility risk is evaluation-stage coverage: while Booxi hosts first-party comparison pages like “Booxi vs Calendly” and “Booxi vs JRNI”, there’s no evidence (from live search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data or of secondary review presence on TrustRadius, which limits how often AI engines can cite Booxi for “best/alternatives” and “worth it” prompts.
Based on audit of booxi.com · Oct 4, 2026