AI Visibility
measured61/100
Frequently Cited · in ETL & Data Integration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
28
across 339 prompts
AI Share of Voice
30%
across 339 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Brand Accuracy
3/183
citations with inaccuracies
How AI Visibility breaks down
in ETL & Data Integration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Boomi is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., G2 and Gartner Peer Insights) and first-party “vs” comparison pages (e.g., Boomi vs Workato/MuleSoft/Celigo). The biggest remaining citation risk is conversion-stage pricing: Boomi’s public pricing is not clearly crawlable as a tiered price list on the main site, so AI answers for “Boomi pricing” may rely on third parties instead of Boomi’s own numbers.
Based on audit of boomi.com · Jul 30, 2026