AI Visibility
measured73/100
Frequently Cited · in FP&A
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals19/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
30
across 165 prompts
AI Share of Voice
30%
across 165 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
4/80
Not Visible · Fp A Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in FP&A
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Board is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Board surfaces in 4/80 Fp A discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 76 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Board is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage comparison queries (e.g., it has first-party “Board vs. Anaplan” and other competitor comparison pages) and has strong B2B review authority (G2 4.4★ with ~319 reviews; Gartner Peer Insights 4.5 with 477 ratings). The single highest-ROI fix is to add crawlable, tiered pricing content and B2B evaluation structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) so Board can win conversion queries like "How much does Board cost?" and finance-fit queries like "Is Board good for finance and FP&A teams?" with first-party citations.
Based on audit of board.com · May 7, 2026