AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals57/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
62
across 13 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 2 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Blackthorn is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries via third-party review surfaces (G2: 307 reviews at 4.6/5 for Blackthorn.io overall; G2 compare pages exist). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/ensure first-party, crawlable evaluation content that directly targets the exact comparison and pricing prompts (especially “How does Blackthorn compare to Cvent/Whova/Eventbrite/Bizzabo/Webex Events & Webinars?” and “How much does Blackthorn cost?”) with schema and SSR so AI engines can cite Blackthorn pages instead of only G2/other sites.
Based on audit of blackthorn.io · Aug 30, 2026