AI Visibility
measured43/100
Frequently Cited · in AI Search
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals38/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
93
across 160 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 144 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Search
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
bing.com is not a B2B SaaS brand in the way G2/Capterra/TrustRadius/Gartner typically cover vendors; AI citation for “best [category] software” style queries is therefore weak. The highest-ROI fix is to create/mark up crawlable, productized pages for Bing’s enterprise offerings (e.g., Bing Ads / Bing Maps / Bing Custom Search) with clear entity descriptions and evaluation-style FAQ content—so AI engines can cite bing.com for “what is X” and “pricing” patterns.
Based on audit of bing.com · May 22, 2026