AI Visibility
measured56/100
Frequently Cited · in Proposal & CPQ
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals51/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
45
across 180 prompts
AI Share of Voice
45%
across 180 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
41/80
Challenger · Proposal Cpq Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Proposal & CPQ
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Better Proposals is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Better Proposals surfaces in 41/80 Proposal Cpq discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 39 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
betterproposals.io already has meaningful AI citation strength for proposal/CPQ discovery queries (e.g., “top proposal tools for sales teams” is cited by multiple LLMs) and solid third-party review authority on G2 and Capterra. The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage feature-fit questions for CPQ/analytics/approvals (e.g., “What does CPQ software do?” and “How do I manage approvals for proposals within my organization?”) because the site’s first-party content appears more proposal/document-focused than CPQ/CPQ-analytics/approval-workflow-specific.
Based on audit of betterproposals.io · Jun 8, 2026