AI Visibility
measured8/100
Invisible · in Collaboration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals41/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 297 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 297 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Ci Cd Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Collaboration
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Axolo is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Axolo surfaces in 0/80 Ci Cd discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Axolo has strong third-party evaluation authority via G2 (102 reviews, 4.8★), so it’s likely to be cited for evaluation-stage “best peer code review software” prompts. The biggest AI-citation blockers are missing/unclear first-party evaluation assets on axolo.co—especially dedicated “[Axolo] vs PullFlow” / “[Axolo] vs Actioner” pages, a crawlable “How much does Axolo cost?” pricing page, and B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage). Highest-ROI fix: publish SSR, self-contained evaluation pages for “How does Axolo compare to PullFlow?” and “How does Axolo compare to Actioner?” plus a crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers, then add SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema so AI engines can quote them reliably.
Based on audit of axolo.co · May 14, 2026