AI Visibility
measured47/100
Frequently Cited · in AI Sales Assistant
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals14/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
59
across 501 prompts
AI Share of Voice
59%
across 501 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Sales Assistant
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Avoma is visible in
3Executive summary
Avoma is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (1,362 reviews and 4.6/5 on G2) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Avoma’s /compare and multiple “Avoma vs Gong/Chorus/Clari/Fireflies” style pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B SoftwareApplication + Organization structured data on key product pages (and ensure llms.txt/robots.txt are accessible), because schema gaps reduce rich evaluation/citation eligibility even when the brand is otherwise strong.
Based on audit of avoma.com · Jun 7, 2026