[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Avoma
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

14

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

53

across 447 prompts

AI Share of Voice

53%

across 447 prompts

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
291 category
Cited65%189/291
Share of voice62%avg
Engine consensus43%of engines
Competitors3.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Avoma is visible in

3
  • AI Sales Assistant18 of 117→
  • Meeting Tools45 of 103→
  • Revenue Intelligencenot yet measured→

Executive summary

Avoma is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (1,362 reviews and 4.6/5 on G2) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Avoma’s /compare and multiple “Avoma vs Gong/Chorus/Clari/Fireflies” style pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B SoftwareApplication + Organization structured data on key product pages (and ensure llms.txt/robots.txt are accessible), because schema gaps reduce rich evaluation/citation eligibility even when the brand is otherwise strong.

Based on audit of avoma.com · Jun 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy