AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Audit & SOX
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals30/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
61
across 21 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 5 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Audit & SOX
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
AuditFile is a B2B audit/workpaper SaaS for CPA firms, and it already has meaningful AI-citation traction via G2 (17 reviews, 4.3/5). The biggest risk for AI evaluation queries is missing/unclear first-party comparison content ("AuditFile vs ..." style) and incomplete structured-data/AI-crawler discoverability signals (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/llms.txt/robots.txt not verifiable from live search). Highest-ROI fix: publish crawlable first-party evaluation pages ("AuditFile vs [competitor]" and "AuditFile pricing" FAQ blocks) and ensure SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema is present on those pages.
Based on audit of auditfile.com · Aug 29, 2026