Other products from Archbee
AI Visibility
measured11/100
Emerging · in Wiki & Docs
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 352 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 327 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Wiki & Docs
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Archbee is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (118 reviews, 4.6★) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/weak first-party structured evaluation surfaces (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema and robust brand-led comparison pages for Document360/GitBook/alternatives), which can prevent Archbee from consistently winning prompts like "How does Archbee compare to Document360?" and "What are the best alternatives to Archbee?". Highest-ROI fix: add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema on key evaluation pages and create brand-led, indexed comparison pages that explicitly cover Document360 and GitBook.
Based on audit of archbee.com · Apr 2, 2026