AI Visibility
measured61/100
Frequently Cited · in Digital Asset Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals9/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
35
across 529 prompts
AI Share of Voice
35%
across 529 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Digital Asset Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Aprimo is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 283 reviews on G2) and analyst/enterprise signals (Gartner Peer Insights page exists; Gartner Magic Quadrant/Leader claims appear in press/LinkedIn). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation/crawlability for comparison + pricing: ensure there are clearly indexed first-party “[Aprimo] vs [Competitor]” pages and that pricing is available as crawlable, tiered content (not only “contact sales”).
Based on audit of aprimo.com · May 6, 2026