[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Aprimo
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

9

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

23

across 461 prompts

AI Share of Voice

23%

across 461 prompts

Category Visibility

#7

in Digital Asset Management · of 69

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
257 category
Cited39%100/257
Share of voice31%avg
Engine consensus46%of engines
Competitors19.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Aprimo is visible in

3
  • Digital Asset Management7 of 69→
  • Content Marketingnot yet measured→
  • Marketing Automationnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Aprimo is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 283 reviews on G2) and analyst/enterprise signals (Gartner Peer Insights page exists; Gartner Magic Quadrant/Leader claims appear in press/LinkedIn). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation/crawlability for comparison + pricing: ensure there are clearly indexed first-party “[Aprimo] vs [Competitor]” pages and that pricing is available as crawlable, tiered content (not only “contact sales”).

Based on audit of aprimo.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy