AI Visibility
measured58/100
Frequently Cited · in Office Suites
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals33/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
98
across 485 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 469 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office Suites
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
AI engines are very likely to cite apple.com for consumer-facing and general tech queries, but it is unlikely to be cited as a B2B software/SaaS evaluation source (e.g., “best [category] software” or “Apple vs competitor” for business tools). The single highest-ROI fix for B2B-style citation would be to publish crawlable, evaluation-intent pages (clear “what it is / who it’s for / pricing” for business offerings) with structured Q&A and SoftwareApplication-style structured data—right now the domain is not behaving like a B2B SaaS listing site.
Based on audit of apple.com · May 7, 2026