AI Visibility
measured19/100
Emerging · in Identity & Access Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 286 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 286 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity & Access Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Apono is visible in
2Executive summary
Apono is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a live G2 presence (with reviews visible) and strong first-party documentation that supports “how it works” and “who it’s for” style questions. The biggest risk pattern is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage comparison queries that require crawlable, tiered pricing and first-party “[Apono] vs [Competitor]” pages that are clearly indexed and structured for AI extraction—your pricing appears sales-led and not self-serve tiered.
Based on audit of apono.io · Jun 3, 2026