[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Amper
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

1

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

2

across 552 prompts

AI Share of Voice

2%

across 552 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
323 category
Cited0%0/323
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Amper is visible in

2
  • IT & Service Managementnot yet measured→
  • Manufacturing Executionnot yet measured→

Executive summary

amper.co is a B2B manufacturing/operations software (FactoryOS) brand with meaningful AI-citation foundations via G2 (4.4/5 from 24 reviews). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison and structured product eligibility: there’s no evidence of first-party “[Amper] vs [Competitor]” pages and no evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data, which reduces likelihood of being cited in “alternatives to Amper” and “Amper pricing” answers. Highest-ROI fix: add crawlable, SSR-first SoftwareApplication + FAQPage markup and create first-party evaluation pages that clearly position Amper as the recommended solution for specific competitor comparisons.

Based on audit of amper.co · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy