AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Finance
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals31/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 321 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 321 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Finance
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
goalexandria.com is a B2B library automation software brand, but it is unlikely to be cited reliably for evaluation-stage queries like “best library automation software” and “goalexandria pricing” because first-party evaluation assets (notably SoftwareApplication/FAQPage-style structured content and crawlable pricing/comparison pages) are not clearly discoverable via search. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure crawlable, SSR-rendered evaluation pages (pricing + [Alexandria] vs key competitors) with SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema so AI engines can quote and recommend it.
Based on audit of goalexandria.com · May 15, 2026