AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 452 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 452 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/79
Not Visible · Office Productivity Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
AhaSlides surfaces in 0/79 Office Productivity discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 79 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
AhaSlides has strong B2B citation anchors (G2 seller page shows 332 reviews and Gartner Peer Insights shows a 4.4 rating with 34 ratings), but it is still missing from high-intent office-productivity shortlist queries like “best communication software for higher education” and “office collaboration tools for remote teams in tech.” The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/expand first-party evaluation content (brand-led “AhaSlides vs …” pages + FAQPage blocks) that explicitly maps AhaSlides to those office/industry use cases so AI engines can cite it for evaluation-stage queries.
Based on audit of ahaslides.com · May 7, 2026