[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Acuityscheduling
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

8

across 186 prompts

AI Share of Voice

2%

across 163 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
95 category
Cited1%1/95
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
16 brand-level
Cited56%9/16
Share of voice52%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
9 brand-level
Cited67%6/9
Share of voice37%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
10 brand-level
Cited90%9/10
Share of voice70%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Acuityscheduling is visible in

1
  • Meeting Toolsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Acuity Scheduling is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “best online appointment scheduling software” because it has strong G2 presence (4.6/5 from 407 reviews) and meaningful secondary review coverage (TrustRadius 132 reviews). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages (e.g., “Acuity Scheduling vs Calendly/Setmore”) and ensure they’re crawlable/SSR so AI can cite Acuity directly for “X vs Y” decisions.

Based on audit of acuityscheduling.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy