AI Visibility
measured49/100
Frequently Cited · in Web CMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals64/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
98
across 263 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 247 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Web CMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Acquia is strongly positioned to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial G2 presence (1089+ reviews on G2) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., Acquia vs Pantheon). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-crawlable structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and ensure pricing + key product pages are fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can quote specifics for “Acquia pricing” and “Acquia vs competitor” prompts.
Based on audit of acquia.com · May 10, 2026