AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals64/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 164 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 164 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories AccessOwl is visible in
1Executive summary
AccessOwl is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation and conversion queries because it has a strong G2 presence (13 reviews shown on its G2 seller page) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with tiered per-user pricing. The biggest risk for AI shortlists is missing/unclear structured-data coverage (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregate rating) and potentially incomplete secondary review/analyst signals (no confirmed TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights profile found in live search).
Based on audit of accessowl.com · Oct 2, 2026