AI Visibility
measured19/100
Emerging · in Government & Public Sector
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals40/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 408 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 408 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Government & Public Sector
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories AccessE11 is visible in
1Executive summary
AccessE11 has strong B2B review credibility (17 G2 reviews at 4.8★) and clear category positioning for citizen request/311-style management, which supports AI shortlist inclusion for “best citizen request software” style prompts. The highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable evaluation content for the exact competitor-comparison and pricing query patterns (especially “How does AccessE11 compare to OpenGov?” and “How much does AccessE11 cost?”), because current first-party comparison/pricing crawlability appears weak and pricing is largely “request pricing”/quote-based.
Based on audit of accesse11.com · Oct 18, 2026