Subcategory · AI Citation Index
Legal AI Research
Legal AI research tools show wildly erratic citation data; Harvey leads at 92, but with only 4 monthly samples no consensus shortlist exists.
0 discovery queries · refreshed Oct 23, 2026
Get weekly AI visibility changes for Legal AI Research sent to your inbox.
Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.
Brands to know
In this category
Harvey
Harvey posts the highest score at 92 (June 2026, n=1). Without repeat citations or multi-prompt validation, it remains a statistical outlier rather than a proven category leader.
Read brand profile →Casetext CoCounsel
Casetext CoCounsel scores 34 (September 2026, n=1). The brand sits near the category average but lacks comparative context to confirm competitive position.
Read brand profile →Spellbook
Spellbook registers 14 (May 2026, n=1), the lowest non-zero score. Insufficient citation frequency prevents differentiation from noise.
Read brand profile →Henchman
Henchman scores 0 (October 2026, n=1). A zero on single-sample data offers no signal — the brand may be uncited, miscategorized, or outside the prompt set tested.
Read brand profile →Robin
Robin carries a null score and a timestamped slug suggesting legacy or test data. No citation record exists to assess relevance.
Read brand profile →Want to know if AI cites your brand for Legal AI Research?
Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.
Run an audit →